Of all the amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals in the world, the
most abundant species is probably the chicken. At any one time,
approximately 20 billion cocks and hens are alive on the planet (though
never for long).
Chickens owe this abundance, of
course, to their place on our table. About 90 million tons of chicken
meat are consumed every year, plus 67 million tons of eggs, compared
with 110 million tons of pork and 67 million tons of beef. Between 1970
and 2005, world production of poultry meat more than quadrupled. (click below to read more)
The red jungle fowl was domesticated
around 4,000 years ago in India, where it still calls cock-a-doodle-doo
in tiger-infested forests. But the triumph of the chicken is relatively
recent. Until a couple of decades ago, beef and pork outweighed poultry
in the average American diet. Fifty years ago, chicken was a scarce
delicacy in many European countries.
What accounts for the rise of cheap
chicken? First, motorized transport led to the growth of the intensive
broiler industry, in which food is brought to the birds rather than vice
versa. Second, selective breeding led to birds that were more efficient
at converting grain into meat. Remarkably, this genetic improvement
even now shows no sign of tailing off.
Ten years ago, Dr. Gerry Havenstein at
North Carolina State University did a careful study of weight gain in
chickens, comparing (under identical conditions) a modern 21st-century
breed with a 1957 breed that had been kept going. He found that, at six
weeks of age, the modern chicken was six times as heavy and had 9% more
breast meat. Of that improvement, he found, 85% came from genetics and
only 15% from better feed.
By 2001, when the study was done, a
chicken reached the weight at which it would be killed in one-third of
the time and after eating one-third of the food compared with the 1957
breed. That represents a considerable reduction in waste and in the
amount of land devoted to growing feed per chicken.
In the decade since, there has been a
consistent and linear increase in both weight gain and food-conversion
efficiency in the broiler industry. Outside the lab, on the farm,
chickens have accelerated their daily rate of growth by about 0.89 grams
per year.
Nothing illustrates the power of
selection in breeding better than this extraordinary change. But
geneticists had expected the improvements to plateau by now. Shouldn't
all of the best genetic combinations have been discovered? No less
confounding is the fact that this effect has not been confined to
chickens: The milk yield of dairy cattle shows similar linear
improvement.
Two possible explanations for the
continuing trend are that there is a lot more hidden genetic variability
in a typical genome than scientists thought, or that brand new genetic
mutations are happening fast enough to supply fresh variability to the
selectors.
Whichever explanation is true, there's
every chance that chicken growth rates may accelerate more, thanks to
"genomic selection." This means testing many different birds to hunt
down what mutations are boosting chickens' performance, using a gene
chip with 60,000 single-letter DNA variants on it. You can then use that
information to predict, even before they've hatched, which chicks will
grow into successful fathers.
Many people would prefer chickens to
be scratching, free-range, in farmyards. Given that this is impractical
if the 3.5 billion people who live in cities are to eat affordable
chicken meat, the genetic improvement of chickens is, on balance, good
news. It means that they are fed from ever smaller acreages of land,
leaving more for nature, and produce less waste. Nor is it clear that
their living one-third as long is any more cruel, since they are killed
either way—and they can be bred to be less fretful.
No comments:
Post a Comment